Saturday 9 September 2017

The Organizers of the Summer 2017 Caledonia Blockade - Professional Protesters and Those Awarded Large Settlements

Throughout the whole ordeal of the August 10th to September 5th 2017 blockade of Argyle Street South in Caledona, I thought about the organizers who were there most every day, and kept asking myself, "How are these people able to show up every day to a protest?  Don't they have jobs that require their presence?  Of course some of the older ones may have been retired or independently wealthy, and some may have been funded by the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC).

Professional Protesters:  It is a well known fact, as I have blogged about time and time again since 2013, that the HCCC has bilked millions of dollars from the green energy corporations such as Samsung by convincing them that they had treaty rights (there is no treaty that covers Six Nations, as I have spoken about time and time again with postings of the original documents), and that there is unsurrendered land in the Haldimand Tract (again, I have shown that this is a false assumption by using the documentation signed by the Chiefs in Council), and that they are the legitimate government of the Six Nations people (this false assertion was at the root of the recent protest).  No one outside this group at Six Nations appears to know where the money went.  The HCCC have never opened their books to the Community (which has been but another thorny issue here abouts).  They could have used some of the millions of dollars to pay the protesters to keep vigil at the barricades.

The Settlement:  However, one of my relatives reminded me that a protest organizer is likely still living off the avails of a "settlement" with a hospital in Hamilton - one that was very controversial.  As is often the case, instead of dragging the matter through Court, the hospital provided an undisclosed sum in a "settlement".  Virtually all of us working in the system believed this person had bilked "the system", and in the process ruined the careers of a number of health care professionals.  I guess this person to this day has been able to live with themselves, and not worry too much about the considerable collateral damage.

Who is this person?  I am not going to open myself to litigation by an individual who would drag anyone through the Courts until they cried "uncle".  What I will do is cite "redacted" facts, those that I recall, those that likely can be verified by an inquisitive reporter who has the backing of media conglomerates.

My point in all this is to expose the background of the parties orchestrating the unconscionable acts which have had such a negative impact on Caledonia.

Here is what I recall, assisted by the recall of my relative.  While working as a health care provider in what is today the Hamilton Health Sciences system, a group of 7 hospitals and partner facilities "offering specialty care to people throughout the entire life cycle" (click here), I became familiar with one of the protest organizers.

Although the matter was covered extensively in The Hamilton Spectator and on CHCH TV news, since this occurred in the early 1990s, in the days before the Internet as we know it today, google searches are going to be unproductive.  The data resides in the archival files of the Spectator on microfilm, and in the minds of many of us who were working in the health system in Hamilton at the time.

To keep the information in this posting on point, I will simply list the most important details in the sequence they occurred:

1)  The person brought their aged mother to a hospital in Hamilton with symptoms of cardiac failure.

2)  During the mother's stay, the family (led by the 2017 "protester") claimed that the hospital was "racist" since the hospital was unable to provide a "translator" for the mother who allegedly only spoke Onondaga.  Of course Onondaga is a dead / dying language at Six Nations and so the demand was unreasonable.  Also to the best of my knowledge the mother spoke English; and it occurred to me at the time that if there was a concern, why did the person or other members of the family not assist here.

3)  The mother, died of cardiac failure; but the family believed that the death was caused by a Tylenol allergy.

4)  The family initiated a law suit, where, during the inquest experts testified that there had been no documented cases of "Tylenol allergy".  Also the family claimed that their mother did not speak English and did not understand that the nurse was telling her she was being given Tylenol - which if true would be highly important.  However my relative was one of the nurses who gave the patient Tylenol (there was a doctor's order), and claims that the patient understood what she was given, and responded in the affirmative when asked if it helped any with her pain.

5)  Then, as now, it is often best for those institutions or corporations accused of anything, especially when the "race card" is in play, to simply "settle" and avoid further litigation.

6)  The family received a massive "out of Court" settlement.

7)  Blame (since there needs to be a scapegoat) was ascribed to the nurse who happened to be on shift at the time the mother died.

8)  There was massive fallout within the system including resignations of excellent health care professionals who were dragged through this "no win" situation.

Hence, it is likely that the protest organizer is still living comfortably on the funds obtained from the hospital, and would have ample time to orchestrate protests.

The above is based on memory (of two persons) and if there are errors, I apologize in advance, and will be pleased to make any necessary corrections.  I have not, nor will I, name the person or family discussed here.

DY




Thursday 7 September 2017

The Aftermath of the Caledonia Blockade Summer 2017 - What Have We Learned This Time?

Now that a sense of normalcy (or an approximation since we live in Caledonia) has returned to the area, we can begin to ask some questions and formulate some potential solutions - based on the belief that most of us don't want to see a repeat of what I have described in the last half dozen postings to this blog.

First, if possible, if there is any way to bring some levity in to lighten the mood, that can only be a good thing.  The cartoon with the Editorial in The Hamilton Spectator of 7 September 2017 will strike the right cord:

Cartoon
Credit:  Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator

Please read the whole editorial, entitled, "The Spectator’s View: Tolerance for illegal protests must have limitshere.  The above cartoon hits the nail right on the head!

The cartoonist, Graeme MacKay, has a whole series of cartoons focusing on Caledonia - they are exceptional, and hilarious.  To see the collection click here.

The Six Nations Helped, But:  There is really only one exception I would take concerning the well written and well thought out editorial itself, and that is the "partially correct" statement that the situation was kept in check because there was pressure from Six Nations on the "protesters".  Indeed that was true, and the main core came from the business people along Sixth Line on the Rez, who, due to the blockade, were hurting badly as their profits dwindled to unsustainable levels.  They had a significant influence on the perceptions of others on the Reserve.

The reality is that perhaps 20% of Six Nations are supporters of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC), and they are well aware that with dwindling Longhouse membership, they face the potential of extinction as a group in the very near future.  Maybe 20% are supporters of the Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC), with often only 3% of eligible voters turning up for the election of Councillors.  The rest are somewhere in the middle, somewhat apathetic, and / or sit on the fence.  There is complete disunity in relation to who should be considered the "legitimate" representatives of Six Nations - but as is so often the case, the loudest voice gets heard.

So I am not about to give Six Nations a pat on the back here, it was largely (but not entirely) self interest that ensured that this "protest" would make no headway and lose support with each passing day.  I can assure one and all that there are thousands on the other side of the Rez line (Oneida Road) who, given the right circumstances, and an issue that would galvanize broader support, would once again come together with cars, trucks, heavy equipment, ATVs and motorcycles pouring down Sixth Line to "do battle".  It would only take a different dynamic, then the telephone tree and social media would kick into gear and it will once again be "us against them" - as was the case in 2006 and largely from then until August 10th.

The good news is that many on Six Nations are jaded in relation to the methods of protest.  Also major protests are likely to be localized.  The bad news for us, it is localized to the eastern end of the Reserve - yes proximal to Highway 6 (from Hagersville to Caledonia).  While some "intense" activity might occur on the north side of Caledonia, logistically there will not be the likelihood of thousands participating when you have to go cross the bridge and thread your way through well established neighbourhoods to reach the site.  The OPP could "head this off at the pass" and so it would fizzle out fairly soon since key resources would not be available.  So forget about heavy equipment etc.  The south side of Caledonia will always be the theater of choice for any mass protest - it has all the right ingredients - and it all boils down to geography.  Lucky us!

Caledonia is chronically caught in the middle of matters that have nothing what so ever to do with them.  We are innocent pawns, and have to depend on the actions of our Haldimand Mayor and Councillors, and the OPP - but generally this means just allowing the situation to play out.  We are ignored by the Federal and Provincial Governments (with few exceptions, such as our local MPP).

Correct Assertion re OPP:  The main point of the editorial, that illegal protests should not be met with an OPP response of "standing down", is spot on.  Ever since the "Dudley George affair" at Ipperwash, the OPP have done everything in their power to keep out of any altercations or illegal actions which involve "Natives".  The situation got so bad in 2006 that they would not even send out officers to rescue one of their own stranded in the no - go zone.  Yes, we still have a two - tiered policing system.  Some actions will get a local from Caledonia arrested on the spot, an example carrying a Canadian flag near the Douglas Creek Estates - which is seen as a provocative act.  However those designated as "Native" can prance around the same area with a Mohawk Warriors flag and essentially be ignored by the OPP (at least in the past).  So when Caledonians see Six Nations Confederacy (purple and white) and Mohawk Warrior (red and yellow) flags flying day and night at DCE, most of us just see "red" and think "double standard", hypocrisy - this based on our experience from 2006 to about 2014 (when things became more quiet at DCE) - prior to the renewal of conflict in August of this year.

The threat of arrest is very effective in deterring criminal protest acts - as long as there is not the possibility of huge "reinforcements" streaming in from the Rez as happened in 2006.  That need NEVER happen again with the proper preparations (e.g., being proactive in blocking key access roads).

It is important to note, however, that if the criminal act is something significant such as assault or damage over say $5,000, and enough proof can be obtained (e.g., videos), the Six Nations perpetrator will be arrested later either by the OPP, or on their behalf by the Six Nations Police.  The "Native" will then be charged, held in custody, a Court date set, and if the evidence is compelling, the person will be found guilty and fined, jailed, or more likely given a warning.

Based on the highly efficient and tactically sound approach used to dismantle the Highway 6 Bypass blockade on 5 September; and the rapid response to the attempt to blockade both the railway and the bypass, maybe we are in the process of seeing a "new and improved" OPP, one which will do us proud, I need to see a little more evidence of this.

Suggestions:  I will make a direct request to the OPP, the next time (there will be a next time unfortunately) please step in immediately to clear the road (Argyle Street South) and arrest those who are in the process of committing illegal acts on the spot.  This would indicate that the OPP I once respected was returned to the Province.  Perhaps moving past the unfortunate Ipperwash situation and simply applying the same law in the same way to each and every person would go a long way to meeting that end.

If circumstances would be more favourable by a slight delay, that certainly makes sense.  If for example, it means blocking 5th, 6th, and 7th Line with the help of the Six Nations Police, as well as the junction of Argyle Street South and the Caledonia Bypass - that would probably be a more productive approach - and we can change "immediately" to "as soon as all the ducks are lined up in a row".  If there is a choice, operations after dark, and in the rain, will have a greater chance of success.  The use of drones and a "ghetto bird" (helicopter with a night sun) or even better two, will also help ensure what situation might await - especially when used with bull horns.  The chopper also has a psychological effect, and sends the message that arrest is immanent - and will likely send all but the most stubborn scurrying.  If a bearcat and well supported SWAT team can be arranged, so much the better.

The point is that negotiation does not work with these "land protectors" (thugs), history has taught us this over and over.

The Protesters Presently at DCE:  The disgruntled "protesters" have returned to their "headquarters", so now again assemble on the other side of the gate at DCE to "lick their wounds", and plan their next move - like snakes coiled and ready to strike.  The "weapon of choice", when action is taken, will of course be the remnants of the Hydro One tower which stands at the ready, by the gate, poised to spring into action (or more correctly be hauled 50 feet to the middle of Argyle Street South).

Considering that among the road "debris" deposited by the "protesters", and removed by the Ministry of Transport contractor, were tires, many will find the following cartoon again hits its mark:

Graeme MacKay

I lived through the Hagersville Tire Fire of 1990 where 14 million tires burned for weeks and we were under constant threat of evacuation.  The fire was ignited by a group of young worthies from Six Nations (see here) - who did jail time for their misdeeds.  Back in those days it did not matter if you were from Six Nations or Hagersville, if you did the crime, you did the time - no double standard.  The "tire fire technique" was pressed into service by these great "land protectors" again during the 2006 mega conflict, and on numerous other occasions which have received less attention - and apparently tire fires were part of the plan for the Highway 6 Caledonia bypass.

Indeed, as per the question posed in the heading to this posting, we have learned that the Six Nations "protesters" are characterized by considerable "continuity" in their behavioural repertoire (they have little imagination, are highly predictable, and possess little of substance in their toolkit).

Will the Conflict Play Out at the Demolition Derby at the Caledonia Fair?:  For those who are aficionados of the arts and fine wine, you might want to attend our annual "demolition derby" at the Caledonia Fair (28 September to 1 October 2017) - click here.  At both the small car and full size car events (not so much with the kiddie cars), the Caledonia and the Ohsweken (Six Nations) teams have the opportunity to go at it and bash their opponent's vehicles to a smoking mass of crushed steel.  Sometimes the animosity between communities appears to take on a very personal aspect - perhaps this year even more so.  We shall see.

This just in:  I have it on good authority that the OPP has placed a padlock on the gates at DCE.  This, if correct, could be a significant development.  I will investigate, and provide photos, as soon as I return home.

DY

Tuesday 5 September 2017

OPP Dismantles Barricade at Caledonia Bypass

Well, will wonders never cease.  In a nutshell, late last night the OPP moved in with about 50 officers and a "tactical unit" (70 officers in all) at about 11 p.m. and took away most of the debris blocking the Caledonia bypass, citing as the reason, "public safety".  The protesters dispersed and no one was arrested.  The action was taken with the assistance of the Six Nations Police.

Pictures taken on scene by a freelance photographer, as well as details of how the operation unfolded, can be found in the CBC article, "Police dismantling blockade on Highway 6 in Caledonia", 5 September 2017 - click here.

More than 50 OPP officers were observed at the site of a relocated blockade Monday night. OPP said it removed "debris" from the roadway around 11 p.m.
Photo:  David Richie

"In an updated press release, Ontario Provincial Police said both roads have been reopened to through traffic as of 2:20 p.m. Tuesday". 

See here for a local perspective, and the view of Councillor Grice of Caledonia in "OPP dismantle Caledonia blockade", The Sachem, 5 September 2017.

An excellent video of the events can be found at CTV Kitchener, click here.  One item of note is the OPP officer indicating that while to date no arrests have been made, there is an ongoing investigation into any criminal activity that has taken place.

Assessment of Role of OPP:  The one word that comes to mind is, "finally".  I will congratulate the OPP on a job well done.  The "protesters" did not seem to understand that they crossed the line when they blocked the railway, and then Highway 6 - neither of those acts can be tolerated.  Furthermore the OPP correctly "made their move" after dark.  This tactical decision, along with blocking Sixth Line all the way to the Rez ensured that reinforcements could / would not come pouring in as happened in 2006.  The telephone tree and social media would not be able to muster much help under these circumstances.  Of course this time things were very different in that most Six Nations wanted the barricade gone, and to say the least there was tepid enthusiasm for helping to keep it afloat.  Kudos to all.

Impact of These Events on the HCCC:  This did not end well for the HCCC and supporters (the "protesters").  As a matter of fact they may have "lost face" (the image they wish to convey in the eyes of Six Nations and Government authorities).  It ended with the "protesters" or "land protectors" scurrying away in defeat.

If history teaches us anything, it is that there is no ability of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC) and their sympathizers to come up with creative, novel solutions.  They appear unable to see or understand the wider effects of their actions.  Also it is abundantly clear that there is nary a whisker of empathy for the residents of Caledonia - there never has been any.  How will this then play out in the long run?  Probably at some point soon they will swing into action again, likely using the same old tactics that have "worked" before - blockading Argyle Street South.  Like rats in a Skinner box (Psychology 101), they have been rewarded for acting at this one "magical" spot - so this rewarded behaviour is likely to occur again.

My dream is that the HCCC has now lost most of its credibility on Six Nations, and will have no choice but to become a ceremonial group dedicated to reminding the people of their proud past, and will work closely and cooperatively with the Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC) in putting forward their agenda.  However I know full well that the HCCC is rife with factionalism, and will never give in to reality and acknowledge the legal role of SNEC.  Many HCCC chiefships are currently vacant, or occupied by a "chief" not only of the wrong Nation, but the wrong clan.  Meetings are frequently cancelled due to a lack of a quorum, or meetings end abruptly when the Head Chief walks out in a huff.  How could they possibly take over the efficient day to day operation of a community of 23,000.  It is a shame really, because both groups working together would offer strength and continuity.  It is not possible to return to 1924 (let alone 1492), and until HCCC realizes this they will continue to engage in ultimately self destructive actions which only tear the community further apart.

Severe Lack of Understanding of  19th Century History:  Much of what we have seen can be distilled to immense ignorance - on the part of many to most - even the Provincial Government.  I can say this on the basis of having searched all of the Six Nations "Indian Affairs Papers" in the Library and Archives Canada in Ottawa, and the relevant documents housed in the Archives of Ontario in Toronto, as well as all the documents at the Woodland Indian Cultural Educational Center (old Mohawk Institute), over the past many years in my quest to learn more about my own family.  I believe that only myself and P.M., the SNEC Land Researcher, can make a claim to having completed such an extensive search of all relevant documents.

What is vitally important to note is that as shown in the original documents which I have posted to this blog, the original 2006 "reclamation" of the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE) property in Caledonia by Six Nations has no justification except in belief and wishful thinking, and was therefore an act of theft.  This parcel and surrounding land was surrendered by 47 Chiefs in Council in 1844.  Thus that occupation of the property was unconscionable, as was the original blockade, let alone the explosion of violence and vandalism that followed.  Therefore the lands at DCE were obtained by fraud, and the barricade was there as a result of a criminal act.  Thus there was no need for the Ontario Government to agree to hand over the Burtch lands in Brant County to any group within Six Nations in order to remove the blockade - this was blatant extortion.  So it follows that there was no valid rationale for establishing the 2017 blockade of Argyle Street South; and so the OPP had the responsibility to remove it immediately.  The events of 10 August to 5 September 2017 should never have happened, let alone the antecedent actions.

Effect on Caledonia 2017:  Boiling it all down, we  suffered in Caledonia because of "internal strife" (factionalism) at Six Nations, as well as wider ignorance of the facts.  We were the victims (again) of the incorrect rationale of the HCCC who are always quick to point the finger of blame at the Federal or Ontario Governments, both of whom are factually blameless in this whole debacle.  However we in Caledonia are more "accessible" than either of the Governments in Ottawa or Toronto, so we are the ones who get sucker punched.

The financial losses suffered by Caledonia (and Six Nations) businesses is significant, and is a matter of which we will learn more shortly.  Residents of Caledonia can confirm that it is a shame that after all we have been through since 2006, the blockade of Argyle Street South was allowed to remain for almost a month - and who knows for how much longer if Six Nations people were not pressuring them to move.  Again kicked in the teeth.  If others ever want to know what it feels like to be a sacrificial lamb offered up to political correctness run amuck, Government inaction, and police hesitancy to act against Indians, come live on the south side of Caledonia.  Our only allies were (are) the Mayor of Haldimand and Council.

Every day those at the southern end of town are forced to look upon the derelict, tick infested, moonscape that is the present Douglas Creek Estates site, which was once again the hub of the militant acts.  The illegal "occupiers" have destroyed everything on site but left trash and debris within the fence they chose to construct.  It is a horrid reminder of all that has happened.  For some, particularly those residing nearest to DCE, this is in the category of "post traumatic stress".  The stress factor cannot be quantified.

In Sum:  So, knowing what has happened, and that the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour, I ask the question, "what is next", and "when will it happen"?  This time it was all about who at Six Nations has control of a field of soy beans in Brant County, tomorrow and the day after .................

I will end this posting on a somewhat upbeat note, garnished with the cruel reality we must endure.  The most recent article in The Sachem, 6 September 2017, is entitled, "Caledonia roads open, but police remain on scene at DCE" - click here.  One quote is from the optimistic side of things:  "It was a refreshing sight for Caledonia residents on Wednesday morning as all roads in and around Caledonia are open for the first time in over a month".  On a more sobering note: "a police presence of two cars remains outside the fenced gate of the Douglas Creek Estates property".

So while all is well for the moment, the OPP are well aware that at any minute the "protesters" are likely to drag that pathetic purloined piece of Hydro One property across the road and once again trigger the whole blockade process.

This is all part of the "background" to life and living hereabouts.  We live in Caledonia, an idyllic town situated along the historic and beautiful Grand River, but the prototypical example in Ontario of a community distressed due to recurrent extended periods of lawlessness.  It is really very hard to live this way - with the "sword of Damocles" hanging over our heads - "when will it drop next?"

Addendum:  The most comprehensive coverage of the matter, particularly the details of the removal of the Highway 6 bypass blockade, can be found on the CHCH News in Hamilton of 5 September 2017 (but posted 6 September), entitled "Caledonia Blockade cleared" and can be found here. Note at the end of the clip, the ominous statement from the "protesters" ensconced behind the fence gates at DCE (where once again the old tower was dragged - this artifact is fast becoming a museum piece with its own story to tell).

Sometimes we wonder whether any outside Caledonia, say media people, really understand what is truly percolating under the surface.  There is a very good article, "Scott Thompson:  Caledonia gets town back, for now" in CHML (audio and blog) of 6 September 2017 - click here.  Clearly Mr. Thompson can see to the root of the problem and how Caledonia is merely a pawn in other peoples games.

I get the sense that the media in general does understand that this present situation has nothing to do with land claims, and everything to do with internal politics at Six Nations, and that Caledonia is being victimized by those who would hold the town hostage to meet their own arcane goals.  Clearly a step forward.

DY


Monday 4 September 2017

The Caledonia Argyle Street Barricade Has Moved to the Caledonia Bypass!

This whole situation gets more and more bizarre.   I expect that the "protesters" are yielding to those on Six Nations (the majority) who want the current barrier on Argyle Street South in Caledonia dismantled.  For over two weeks it has blocked the southern entrance to Caledonia at the old Douglas Creek Estates (DCE) site, the area of so much conflict since 2006.  Word has it that certain business owners on the Sixth (6th) Line on the Six Nations Reserve have threatened the "activists" as the former see their bottom line sink further and further into the red.

Perhaps the photo below, credit to Tamra Botting, will explain the present situation - at least to locals:

BYPASS
The Caledonia Bypass (Highway 6) where it crosses Sixth Line

In an update of an article published earlier today, entitled, "Clairmont:  Rumors swirl around Caledonia blockade", The Hamilton Spectator, 4 September 2017 (click here) we learn of a significant new development.  Here is the "add on" information from the article:

"It's hard to know what's going on at the Indigenous protest barricade in Caledonia, never mind what it all means.
For days, rumours were swirling on social media and some news sites that the Argyle Street barrier would be moved to the Hwy. 6 overpass. 
That eventually did happen on Monday afternoon, offering some relief to frustrated business and homeowners.
But for much of the long weekend, determining what exactly was happening with the Caledonia blockade was a challenge". 
Apparently the "protesters" have moved to the Caledonia Bypass, but as we will see later, this will likely set the stage for even more anger emanating from Six Nations businesses on Sixth Line.

The Sachem has now published an updated article on the subject, "Caledonia blockade moved to highway 6 bypass", 4 September 2017 (click here) including information from the OPP as to which areas they have blocked off (the entire Caledonia Bypass from Argyle Street South, across the Grand River, to Green Road:

From OPP Twitter

Here follows quotes from the article:

"There is also a police presence at the intersection of Argyle Street at 6th Line preventing traffic from continuing through.
The move of the barricade comes two days after a press release from the protestors stating that they would not be moving the barricade due to the “threat of mass police arrests.”
In the statement on Saturday, the protestors said they wanted to move the barricade because they were “sensitive to the impact” of the barricade on “Caledonia and Six Nations business owners and residents.”
The blockade on Argyle Street, which was first set up on Aug. 10, was taken down Monday as the new blockade on the bypass was set up. By late afternoon, traffic was flowing on Argyle Street – but was quite heavy due to the blocked bypass. OPP officers were directing traffic at major intersections in Caledonia.
Visible from the 7th Line bridge over the Highway 6 bypass were groups of protestors to both the north and south. They had pulled a small tree across the bypass near where it crosses the Grand River".
Areas Noted Above

So, based on the last statement, it appears that the local worthies (thugs) are setting up for a deja vu 2006.  It should be noted that 7th Line (shown as River Range on the OPP map) is also known as Stirling Street.  It ends at the railway tracks since the bridge that joined 7th Line to Stirling Street was torched (arson) by Six Nations criminals in 2006.

Something resembling a rationale for the move was given in an article, "Six Nations activists move blockade to Highway 6 and Sixth Line in Caledonia"  in The Sachem (same date as above), who added the following:

"On Monday afternoon Six Nations protesters moved their demonstration and blockade from Argyle Street South in Caledonia to Highway 6 and Sixth Line in Caledonia.
At approximately 1:30 p.m. Monday afternoon, OPP responded to reports that a group of individuals were blocking Highway 6".

CBC reports also point to a blockade of Highway 6 and Sixth Line in, "Six Nations activists move blockade to Highway 6 and Sixth Line in Caledonia" (click here) stating, 

"On Monday afternoon Six Nations protesters moved their demonstration and blockade from Argyle Street South in Caledonia to Highway 6 and Sixth Line in Caledonia".  

And furthermore that, "Police say in the interest of public safety, OPP have closed Highway 6 between Argyle Street North and Greens Road, and Sixth Line between Argyle Street South and Oneida Road.
Detour traffic routes are being put in place for Highway 6 traffic.
At approximately 1:30 p.m. Monday afternoon, OPP responded to reports that a group of individuals were blocking Highway 6".
An article in Turtle Island News, "Caledonia barricade down, blockade on Highway 6 bypass goes up" (click here) seems to confirm that the actual barricade is on the bypass as shown in the picture above.

Furthermore,

"On Monday afternoon, Kanonhstaton Six Nations released a statement about the relocation.
'We the people of Kanonhstaton have successfully removed the barricade on Argyle Street in an effort to unify the people of Six Nations and relieve pressure on our people and the residents of Caledonia."
"We have also erected a barricade on Highway 6 bypass in an effort to apply pressure on Canada to return to the negotiation table in accordance with the silver covenant chain and two row wampum. We will continue to occupy the road and call on all of our brothers and sisters for support.'"

CTV has an excellent video (click here) in an article entitled, "Caledonia demonstrators move blockade", providing a fine overview and status of the problem to today.  Also CHCH TV in Hamilton has an informative video entitled, "Caledonia blockade moved to Highway 6" - click here.  What is odd is that there is a view from the River and a protester blockade is seen on the south side with Confederacy (no, not the "Stars and Bars") flags.

Clearly the main Six Nations barricade is on the Highway 6 bypass where it crosses Sixth Line; and the OPP have closed the entire Caledonia bypass, as well as Sixth Line from Argyle Street South to Oneida Road (the Reserve).
Predictions:  If anything, this blockade will create a worse problem due to the large transport trucks which cannot cross the Grand River on Argyle Street, but must use the Caledonia bypass.  As to the impact on Six Nations, 6th Line is blocked by the OPP at the junction of Oneida Road (Reserve boundary) so local Six Nation businesses will see their trade dry up even more.

The problem with heavy vehicles will only come to fruition tomorrow (since today is Labour Day).  It is inconceivable that the OPP would allow this to continue - surely they will now act ............................. and do their duty ....................  If the OPP does go ahead, I strongly suggest that they block 7th Line (River Range, Stirling Street) at the Rez since this will be an access point to the site (Caledonia bypass) - although it will not stop ATVs.

It will be a blessing when I can, in a few days, make personal visits to the sites and hopefully offer unique photos.  Of course this will also mean factual, but perhaps disconcerting (to some) viewpoints, such as why Six Nations are not "aboriginal" nor are they "Native" here.  Thousands of us in Haldimand have equal personal claims to those terms and resent the "special" treatment given to those who happen to reside west of Caledonia.

Stay tuned, updates will be added below.

DY

Sunday 3 September 2017

Attempt to Move Barricade to the Railway Tracks

The subject here will be events relating to the railway tracks situated behind the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE), seen below as a diagonal line between River Range Gas Bar (on the Rez) and Argyle Street South (in Caledonia).  The Caledonia Bypass loops over the tracks as seen in the map below (click to increase size).

Railway Tracks Behind DCE - Shown as Diagonal Line Between Bypass Label  and #6 Sign

Feeling the heat from their own people, the intelligentsia of the thugs blockading Argyle Street South have come up with a plan B.  It is reported in an article, "Incident in Caledonia" found in the Brantford Expositor of 3 September 2017.  To view the whole article click here.

I will quote some parts of the above with "annotations":

"Plans to move a blockade from Argyle Street South in Caledonia to nearby train tracks was thwarted by the threat of mass arrest, say a group of Indigenous demonstrators. [So why have the OPP not threatened mass arrests if the criminals don't remove the blockade on Argyle Street South?]
 The demonstrators issued a statement saying they had decided to move the barricade from Argyle Street (also known as Plank Road), to the train tracks.
“However, the threat of mass police arrests prevented us from taking down the barricade,” the statement said.
The OPP meanwhile, issued their own statement, saying that observed a group of people walking westbound on Sixth Line and as police officers travelled toward the railway tracks they notice wooden pallets on the track that had been set on fire. [Arsonists should be arrested on the spot]
Six Nations Fire attended the scene and put out the fire. [The tracks are not on the Reserve but between the Rez and Argyle Street South. This begs the question, what is the role of Six Nations Police here?There were no injuries but OPP say they are now investigating the fire as mischief.
Const. Rod LeClair of the Haldimand County OPP, had no response to the comment concerning the 'threat of mass arrests' by police.  [So much for being honest and open]
“Our role remains to preserve the peace and maintain the safety of the public and officers,” LeClair said." [In other words, "don't rock the boat, and whatever you do don't upset the Natives]


.
.
.
And further, “This will affect all Onkwehonwe [means "the real people" and is racistnations across Turtle island where traditional Onkwehonwe governments are ignored [because they are antiquated and dysfunctional and can't even muster a quorum], treaties such as the Two Row Wampum [this 1613 item is a trade agreement between two Dutchmen and a half a dozen unidentified Native peopleare broken and Onkwehonwe sovereignty over our land is denied,” they said in their statement. “This issue is particularly relevant and urgent with the announcement by the Trudeau government to separate the INAC (Indigenous affairs) offices in an attempt to mend nation-to-nation relationships [there is no such relationship, the Indian Act prevails and the Crown ruleswith Indigenous communities.” 
Two recent newspaper articles which address this topic are "Clairmont:  Rumors swirl around Caledonia blockade", Hamilton Spectator, 4 September 2017 - click here;  "'Threat of mass police arrests' prevents Caledonia barrier relocation", the Sachem, 4 September 2017 - click here.

So the brave warriors and women who have come up with this novel brilliant plan of blocking the same road as before failed in their attempt to effect any change.  So Plan B, shift gears and instead block the railway line that brings oil, steel and wall board from the area between Nanticoke on Lake Erie to the gypsum plant along 3rd Line and then on to Toronto.  Guess they did not know that blocking a railway is going to result in serious consequences, whereas if you are "Native" you can block access to a quaint Ontario town of 10,000 people indefinitely, and with impunity.

I am sure that many wonder, "don't these people have jobs?".  Who can take two weeks from their schedule to sit in a tent and "protest"?  Does some of the money come from the millions of dollars that the HCCC extorted, on the basis of false assertions, from the green energy companies since 2006?  Good questions, and relevant to understanding who we are dealing with.
So, what is next?  I doubt that even the "protesters" know at this point.
DY

Saturday 2 September 2017

Proof that the Douglas Creek Estates Property Had Been Surrendered by the Six Nations Chiefs in Council in 1844 - Thus the Rationale for Erecting Barricades and Demanding the "Return" of the Burtch Lands Stands on No Foundation Whatsoever

I have never before re posted anything written in this blog.  However the barricades sitting on Argyle Street South in Caledonia exist because of a false belief, and chain of events involving fraud and extortion (which are still illegal in Canada to the best of my knowledge).  This warrants my posting the evidence that "delegitimizes" the entire proceedings from 2006 to today, including:

1)  The first "occupation" (trespass, theft) of the Douglas Creek Estate (DCE) property while homes were under construction in 2006 and obtaining said lands from the legitimate owners by fraud.

2)  The extortion committed against the people of Ontario resulting in handing over the Burtch Correctional lands in Brant County to the Six Nations occupiers as a bribe to get them to remove the first Argyle Street barricade (in 2006).

3)  The illegal erection of another barricade (using the same stolen Ontario One hydro tower) across Argyle Street South in Caledonia in 2017 as a result of an internal dispute between the Hereditary Council (no legal status on Six Nations) and Elected Council (the legal representatives of Six Nations).

So for those who wish to be enlightened on how false beliefs on Six Nations; combined with police failure to enforce the law (Ontario Provincial Police), and Government impotency (Federal and Provincial) can result in sanctioned illegal acts, foster an extraordinary travesty of justice, and ensure that the lives of those who reside in Caledonia will be a living hell, please read the following earlier posting in full.  Since 1844 there has never been any basis for a claim that the DCE lands were unsurrendered - the root cause of all the troubles since 2006:

Documentary Evidence of the Surrender of the Land Where Douglas Creek Estates (Kanonhstaton) is Situated: Signed by 47 Chiefs in the Year 1844

There are numerous posts in this blog and in the media across the country which profile the 2006 take over and occupation of the land where Henco Construction had begun the development that was to be known as Douglas Creek Estates (DCE), perpetrated by activists from the nearby Six Nations Reserve.  Those who took it upon themselves to re-write history claimed that the land was never surrendered and still belonged to the Six Nations and should be incorporated into their land base.  This despite the fact that since 1847 the properties along the Plank Road (where the DCE is located) have been entered into the Ontario Land Registry System.

As noted previously, Six Nations land claims researchers agree that there is no legitimate claim to land that has been surrendered (170 years ago), however there are outstanding claims relating to the use (possible misuse) of the money that, after the land was sold, was placed in trust for the benefit of Six Nations.  I argued that were it not for any sort of reasonable interpretation of "statute of limitations", it would be prudent to provide a cost accounting of the trust fund monies including the monies deployed in the investments in the Grand River Navigation Company.

None the less, many activists at Six Nations and their supporters, clearly have not read the original documents that demonstrate the lead up to the formation of the present day Reserve.  The Reserve of today includes Tuscarora Township and part of Onondaga Township in Brant County; and a strip of land on the western boundary of Oneida Township.  The Chiefs also asked to reserve a 200 acre plot of land around the Mohawk Institute in the City of Brantford.  This mutually acceptable agreement was signed, sealed and delivered by a series of surrenders by the Chiefs in Council culminating in the report of Lord Elgin in 1850 which received Crown ascent.  Since then, there have been recent purchases to add to the Six Nations land base, including lands acquired via the highly questionable agreement between the Ontario Government and Six Nations representatives in 2006.  The latter agreed to remove the barricades blocking Argyll Street, if Six Nations was granted the land where the former Burtch Correctional facility (between the Reserve and the City of Brantford) was situated.  This sounds a lot like extortion.  However the core Reserve has, since 1847 been only the land noted above involving Tuscarora Township and parts of Onondaga and Oneida Township, as well as a 200 acre parcel in the City of Brantford.

To this day, the former DCE is occupied by Six Nations members, and a fence has been erected around the perimeter of the property, and a gate was installed crossing Surrey Street, which is owned by the County of Haldimand.

The goal of the present posting is to provide photographic copies of the original documents proving that DCE (Kanonhstaton) was surrendered prior to 18 December 1844.  After reading the entire series of documents pertaining to the surrender of the various parcels of Grand River land , the present author has been led to an inevitable conclusion.  That is to say, the common belief that the commissioner and superintendent were enacting "colonialist" and "paternalistic" policies which were meant to ensure "cultural genocide" could not be further from the truth.  These dedicated civil servants, David Thorburn and James Winniett, were attempting to ensure the survival of the Six Nations as a people.  At the time the population of about 2,000 was scattered throughout the Grand River Territory from about Dunnville to Brantford, and they were selling their improvements to White settlers then moving somewhere else.  At the time of the surrender of 1844 there were about 2,000 non-Native residents living on the land belonging to the Crown, but held by the Six Nations under right of occupancy.  Clearly the trend for Six Nations people to move west to the Ohio country, or elsewhere, was escalating and soon the Six Nations people would be scattered to the four winds.  Their own lands were dotted with White settlers ("squatters") who generally held title by virtue of a land sale from a Six Nations member.  To save the Six Nations from extinction as a people ("cultural genocide"), the government officials came up with a plan to consolidate the Six Nations settlement to a compact area where they would be a community, and would be safe from encroachments by those wanting the very land on which they lived.  The government made it very clear that no Six Nations person would be required to sell their property and move to the new Reserve, but if at a later date they did wish to sell their property and move to the Reserve, they would have the right to reside there amongst their own people.  Hence the old chestnut of finger pointing at the Government officials, accusing them of trying to destroy the Six Nations as a people is wrong - it was these officials who had the best interests of the Six Nations in mind when they recommended a consolidated Reserve, with the sale of other properties to be placed in a trust fund.  There would be compensation for the "squatters" who had built homes and cleared land which would then be used by incoming Six Nations people, and that money would come from the trust fund.  Hence the understandable confusion about what was placed into, and removed from, the trust fund account.

Here follows the individual pages of one small part of the entire series of Council meetings and surrenders between 1841 and 1849.  The focus here is on the part where the Chiefs gave up their initial idea to lease lands along the Plank Road, and instead reserved only the lands on the west side of the "tier of lots" along the Plank Road.  In other words they reserved only the far western strip of Oneida Township, which is today part of the Six Nations Reserve.

However, I must ask the question:  "Why has it taken so long for these key records to see the light of day?  Why has the Federal Government not released them to show all interested parties why they consider the surrender of 1841, which was capped off by Lord Elgin's report in 1850, valid?  Six Nations must come to the realization that to continue going down the same path, under the delusion that there is a legal basis upon which they could recover lands within the Grand River Tract, is folly.  It would seem incumbent on the Government to "show their cards" so that the Ontario Provincial Police will see the evidence which refutes any claim to "unsurrendered" land.  Furthermore, residents of Caledonia and other communities impacted by Six Nations illegal take over of lands will realize that, for example, the occupants of DCE do not have a leg to stand on.  The Province of Ontario needs to stand firm in the assertion that their Land Titles System (e.g., the deeds registered on title in the Land Registry Office in Cayuga) is valid, legal and secure.  Also the citizens of Ontario whose land is being eyed by those who would take steps to acquire it outside the land registry system, need to stand up for their legal rights without being intimidated by false claims backed up by militancy - bullies and thugs.

The evidence is arranged as follows:  First the handwritten Minutes of Council Meetings and associated documents.  Second a transcript of the handwritten documents.  Third, a map showing the boundaries of the Six Nations Reserve in 1842 in relation to the "tier of lots" west of the Plank Road.  At one point the Chiefs had wished to reserve the lots on the west side of the Plank Road for leasing purposes, however they later "receded from" this temporary position, as seen in the documents below, and unanimously agreed to maintain the eastern boundary along the present line in Oneida Township.

1)  Handwritten Documents Relating to the Surrender of the Lands West of the Plank Road:
































(LAC, RG10, Volume 144, pp. 286-300 [83269-83287]).




2)  Transcripts of the Above Documents Added for Clarity:

Since the above handwriting leaves something to be desired, a transcript of the key parts of these documents are included below, from a transcript made by Garry Horsnell and published in his online, "A Short History of the Six Nations", in 2008.  Click on image to enlarge:





3)  Map of the Six Nations Reserve and Oneida Township Showing the "Tier of Lots" West of the Plank Road:




Note that this map dated 1842 was received by the Department of Indian Affairs in 1896.  As the marginal note on the right indicates, the Indian Reserve as agreed upon in various Council Meetings was the line running between B and E.  The Plank Road is shown as a red line running diagonally north - south.  The "tier of lots" noted in the above documentation refers to the lots situated between the Plank Road on the west side, and running west to the line marking the eastern boundary of I.R. 40, the Six Nations Reserve.  In effect this is the wedge shaped area bounded by D to C (along the Plank Road), and B to E (present day boundary of Six Nations Reserve)  (LAC, RG10M 78903/78, Plan of part of the township of Oneida, date 1842 [1896], Online MIKAN no. 3669668).  The DCE property is within the Lot  labelled C along Plank Road south of Caledonia where Sixth (6th) Line joins the Plank Road.

Google map showing DCE property west of corner of Surrey Street and Argyle St S

In the modern Google map above Oneida Road is the line from E to B in the above 1842 map (the border of the Six Nations Reserve), Argyle Street South (Plank Road, Old Highway 6) is the line running from D on the Grand River beyond McKenzie Creek (the flooded area in the 1842 map) to letter C (where Hagersville is today).  The DCE property is on both sides of Surrey Street west of the forked creek (Douglas Creek).

Conclusion:  Evidence, data, facts, proof, no matter how persuasive; and the concept of "beyond a reasonable doubt" or even the law itself, simply do not override political correctness and the unsupported view of "Natives" (although Six Nations are 1784 refugees from what is now New York) as victims.  So with a police "force" and two levels of Government who would rather operate as a flock of ostrich with their heads in the sand than confront these aggressors with the facts as shown above - we in Caledonia are beat - and the concept of one law for all citizens becomes a travesty, a sad sick joke in Canada.

DY

Friday 1 September 2017

Caledonia Barricade May Move to the Caledonia Bypass (Highway 6)

Every day millions of dollars of goods in 18 wheel transport trucks drive along what is known as the Caledonia bypass, crossing the Grand River through a rural area west (north) of the town of Caledonia.  They cannot drive through Caledonia since the 9 span concrete bridge can barely handle car traffic, and Argyle Street at that point is choked with vehicles at almost any time of the day.  The bridge over the Grand River on the Caledonia bypass was designed to handle heavy transport trucks and us locals always assumed that it would eventually link up with the present Highway 6 where it ends near White Church Road.  Yet to happen.

Caledonia Bypass and Present Barricade at Surrey Street

The DCE property where the present barricade is located at the junction of Argyle Street South and Surrey Street.  The junction of Argyle Street South and the Caledonia overpass can be seen in this map.

If perchance there was a major accident on the bypass, the regular vehicle traffic would be funneled down Argyle Street South which joins Highway 6 about a kilometer from the present barricade. However the problem is extreme for large tonnage vehicles. There is no other crossing point for transport trucks other than huge detours to north of Brantford (Highway 403), or to Cayuga (Highway 3).  Any local will tell you that this would at best be a nightmare; as would any increase in traffic along Argyle Street.

Why do I mention this?  It appears that the brilliant minds who brought you the Argyle Street blockade may uproot themselves on Saturday and instead block the Caledonia bypass.  Why would they do this?  For an answer we can refer to an article of 30 August 2017 entitled, "Ontario broken promise barricade may be moving" in Turtle Island News - click here.  Quoting from said source,

"The Ontario broken promise blockade across Highway 6 (Argyle Street) just outside Caledonia may be moving just as Haldimand Mayor Ken Hewitt says internal Six Nation support is waning.  Turtle Island News has learned the blockade may come down Saturday and move to the Caledonia bypass.  Sources said those at the barricade debated shutting it down after complaints were received from businesses along Sixth Line.  'We don't want to see people lose their businesses so we decided we will move the barricade Saturday', said one source.  Turtle Island News has not been able to confirm the reports received from two people at the site.  But the protesters did receive threats of removal last Thursday (Aug 17)."

So, it appears that there has been pressure by local (Six Nations) businesses to move the barricade.  The thought to just fold up the tents and go home does not seem to have occurred so, the closest option would be to move shop to the Caledonia bypass - guess that the debris field will be left on Argyle Street for Caledonia to clean up.  Once again, there is nary a whiff of concern for Caledonia businesses who are in some cases in dire straits - click here to see a report on this problem, the "protestors" are only concerned when their own people are impacted (some have probably threatened these "barricade managers").

The Caledonia bypass is part of Highway 6 (Argyle Street is known as "Old Highway 6") and extends from the lights at the junction between Argyle Street (which ends there) and Highway 6 northward.  Any potential blockade could be placed between this point, the bridge across the Grand River, all the way to Green Road which funnels into the extreme northern end of Caledonia at Argyle Street north (also known as Highway 6 and Upper James Street - old Highway 6 from Hamilton to Port Dover was once known as the Plank Road).

If this does come to fruition, there is an up side to this in that there would be significantly more pressure on the OPP to dismantle the barricade and arrest the "protesters".  This time the Province would be affected, and one effect is that the transport companies would be furious.  This would NOT in any way put pressure on Ontario to give the Burtch lands to those with whom they did not negotiate a deal (although the luminaries behind the "protest" don't understand this).  The only outcome would be arrests and hopefully stiff fines against those so callous as to disrupt the lives of thousands for no valid reason.

It is interesting that the editor and reporter of "Turtle" give a name to the blockade, namely "The Ontario broken promise blockade".  No other news outlet has done that, and I will leave it to the reader to ascertain the significance.  Also note that the "protesters" (aka thugs and criminals) don't mention any Caledonia businesses, only those on Six Nations.  So once again my point that they don't give a tinkers da*n about Caledonia's people is reinforced.

The supposed action will take place tomorrow, so more then.  Later next week I will be in a position to gravitate to the front lines (if there are any at the time) and provide more pictures and an on site perspective.

DY