Six Nations and Hydro One Deal

It is the intention of the Wynne Liberal Government to privatize Hydro One, which supplies electricity to the people of Ontario.  To say the least it is seen as controversial, hypocritical, and a way to pay down the immense debt created by McGinty and his successor Wynne that came into being due to gross incompetence on so many levels.  Just google "gas plant scandal ontario" for some eye opening information. 

Now, it seems to have occurred to some Liberal politician that if some sweet deal can be offered to the poor "victimized" "Natives" of the Province, it will gain political traction and give the appearance of the Liberals being understanding and supportive of the "special status" of those designated as "Native" in this Province.

The following is from Two Row Times, 27 September 2017, in an article entitled, "Hydro One sale to First Nations offers potential" - click here to view entire article.

The deal:  Of the 60% of Hydro One to be privatized, A 2.5% slice of that 60% was opened up collectively to Ontario’s First Nations communities in 2016 when the Chiefs of Ontario announced an agreement-in-principle with Hydro One.

The plan? Liberals promised to open up 15 million shares to Ontario’s First Nations communities at a reduced rate of $18 a share — that’s about three quarters of the standard share rate of just under $24.  Furthermore, "According to stats released by the Chiefs of Ontario the deal has long term potential to increase to $1.2 billion dollar value over 25 years."  Sweet deal, but only for "First Nations" - everyone else gets at best sloppy seconds.

More specifically, First, in order for the deal to go through at all 80% of the First Nations communities in Ontario have to come on board by the end of 2017.

Next, if a base threshold of 80% of First Nations communities in Ontario are in agreement, which Hill says is just 107 of the 133 communities, the deal will be finalized. However, if 106 say yes and 27 refuse – Hill says the deal will not proceed.

If ratified, the First Nations who agree will start a limited partnership, called Sovereignty Wealth LP,  to collectively hold the shares. Ontario will then give that LP a 25 year loan of up to $268 million dollars for the purchase of the shares.

Finally, in addition to the loan the province is offering $45 million dollars for seed capital over the course of three years. You can almost think of it as the “free gift with purchase”. The Chiefs of Ontario have agreed to bank that seed money to collect interest as an investment into the future generations.  That seems rather generous, for some, the "chosen ones".

The Reality at Six Nations:  What is so appalling is that no one is factoring in the way in which Six Nations has "interacted" with Hydro One since 2006.  I will note 3 issues that have never been resolved, nor has any compensation been paid to the aggrieved parties:

1)  The Smoke Shacks:  At this point I don't know how many illegal shacks are situated illegally on Hydro One owned lands selling illegal untaxed cigarettes.  The most obvious one is at the corner of Argyle Street South and the Caledonia bypass (which at one time included a hamburger stand shut down by the Health Department for appalling sanitary reasons).  These squatters are being allowed to stay because no one has the fortitude to enforce the law and remove them.  The hypocrisy is that if a resident of Caledonia were to do the same thing they would be arrested and the operation shut down immediately.  Those shacks have been in place now for 10 years and with no signs of any movement to change the status quo.  At the very least the owners owe Hydro One rental or lease money for this blatant misuse of Hydro One lands.

2)  The Barricade Tower:  During the riots of 2006 when Six Nations members created anarchy in Caledonia and surrounds, "land protectors" (i.e., thieves and vandals) used what must have been a cutting torch to bring down a Hydro One steel tower, which the "protesters" dragged across Argyle Street South as a barricade.  Many of us will recall the militants standing defiantly with Mohawk Warrior flags in hand and masks to cover their faces on this tower stolen from Hydro One.  Most will know that the Ontario Government capitulated to the demands of these criminals and gave them the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE) property, and via negotiations, the much larger Burtch property in Brant County as a condition for the Six Nations militants to remove the barricade.  

Over the years the tower disintegrated to a stub, which as recently as 25 August was lying across Argyle Street South in the most recent event of this nature.  It was removed from its "resting place" immediately behind the gates to the DCE by the Ontario Provincial Police on Sunday 24 September 2017.

Clearly a valuation must be made of the property that was removed, and Hydro One must be compensated for every penny owed.

3)  The Unstrung Hydro One Towers:  The above tower was part of miles of similar towers extending from Niagara Falls to the Toronto grid.  In 2006, after the tower was removed, the Mohawk Warriors or their supporters defied anyone to enter Hydro One property and finish the work to link Niagara Falls and Toronto.  Hence, since the towers were proximal to the DCE site, inertia, fear, timidness and whatever else has ensured that the towers stand there forlorn - extending as far as the eye can see from Argyle Street South, with absolutely no high tension wires, only empty pulleys, as seen in the picture below.

Line of Hydro One Towers from Argyle Street South 29 September 2017

Same Tower as above Showing Pulleys Without High Tension Wires

The amount of money lost by Hydro One thanks to the actions of Six Nations militants must be close to one billion dollars.  Calculations by knowledgeable people need to be made to have a clear sense of what is owed to Hydro One.

The Point:  It seems that any agreement involving Six Nations involving Hydro One MUST take into consideration how much money is owed to the latter by the former.  There is no negotiating this away.  Hydro One and thus the taxpayers of Ontario have lost significant revenue due to the criminal actions of Six Nations.  Hydro One and the Province of Ontario need to DEMAND the money that is legally theirs.  Until this matter is settled, why would the Province even entertain the idea that Six Nations can "get in on the action" with this new arrangement.  It is high time that the actions that lay at the doorstep of Six Nations are fully addressed - otherwise the whole concept of justice and the law are simply meaningless - or is Six Nations immune here?

DY.

Recent Commotion and Agitation at the Douglas Creek Estates "Protest" Site

Here is an update on the "situation" at the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE) "protest central" site.  Any one who thinks that with all those tents scattered about DCE we are seeing a sign of stability need to look through the other side of the binoculars.  This is a staging area for further "action", and it is only the constant presence of the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) that has kept a lid on things.

An article in Two Row Times of 27 September 2017 entitled, "Highway 6 protests peaceful but tense" (not found in online version) we obtain an update on the shenanigans at DCE that few if any would have seen - even those of us who live in Caledonia and surrounds.  You don't have to be a rocket scientist to predict that once the ruling was made in Brantford, basically in support of the Elected Council, the "protesters" at DCE (supporters of the Hereditary Council) would have some knee jerk reaction that would be totally in line with what they have done previously (since they appear to lack any imagination and ability to formulate a viable Plan B).

Protesters (Domestic Terrorists) Perspective on the Burtch Matter and Provincial Courts:  A spokesperson for the "protesters" was interviewed about OPP actions they took on 25 September 2017 (described below); and about the ruling of the Superior Court in Brantford concerning the Burtch lands.  In relation to the latter, the person replied that it was not the Court case involving a dispute between the Hereditary and Elected councils that was the trigger to recent action at DCE, but rather, "The promised return of this land [Burtch] to the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs traditional government, as it was when it was stolen by Canada many years ago, did not happen".  This is bunk.  Thanks to blatant extortion, the land was promised to the people of the Six Nations via their legal representatives which is the Elected Council.  Secondly, the land (the Burtch property) wasn't "stolen" it was surrendered by all of the Hereditary Chiefs in the 1840s so that it could be sold and the monies placed in the Trust Account for the benefit of the Six Nations people.  I could easily post the specific documents about this property as I have for the Douglas Creek Estates property (if needed I will) - but what is the use, these know nothings won't care one way or the other.

DCE Site from Surrey Street Entrance 29 September 2017

As much as the "protesters" appear to be those who don't recognize the Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC) as the legitimate representatives of Six Nations in day to day running of the Reserve or negotiations with Canada, we get a hint that the "protesters" aren't any too pleased about the present Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC) either.  The above "protester spokesperson" stated that, "I'm not saying the Confederacy doesn't have a lot of work to do as well, in terms of making sure they get the voices of the people heard".  Apparently relying on the Great Law will do the trick (although there are different versions and interpretations) - so in other words the old bed bug in the ointment, factionalism, is still alive and well even within the "protester community".

The spokesperson further explained that, "the protest is the only choice left to them, since the court will always relay [rely] on Canadian Law which is severely slanted towards Ottawa and London England".  So what is the solution here, cause as much disruption to Caledonia and surrounds until the Canadian Government cries "uncle" and gives in to this group and thereby sets a precedent which would cause chaos across the country.  They will never do that.  Eventually they will send in the Canadian Forces as Pierre Elliot Trudeau did many years ago during the FLQ Crisis in Quebec.  I recall armoured vehicles and soldiers with assault weapons on our street.  They were welcomed.  Furthermore, according to the spokesperson, "Some judge can sit in a court in Brantford, Ontario and say that the Confederacy, which has been around for 1,000 years or more, is not a valid government here - well that's the problem" [about the Court ruling in the Burtch farming case].  All the judge did was to cite someone for defying a Court Order, one submitted by SNEC the only currently legitimate authority at Six Nations.  It is hopeless when uneducated people obtain the reins of authority in "protests" of this nature since perception is reality and no amount of evidence can change their thinking.

So instead of relying of the Courts, and evidence, the "protesters" have in their wisdom decided that, "Wins are made on the land.  Wins are made in the bush.  That's the only place we get our wins from, and so, if we are going to start asserting our sovereignty it will be on the land and on the roads and in the bush.  We are Two Row Wampum people and we are defending that sovereignty".  So in other words, create as much discomfort for the unlucky people who happen to reside close to the Reserve!  That is sure to win many friends both on and off the Reserve.  Good luck with that.  Brilliant tour de force I must say.  How about contemplating Canadian Forces troops in "the Bush" to root out the terrorists and restore law and order in the region.

OPP Tactics:  On Saturday, 23 September, the OPP noticed that the occupiers of DCE were dismantling some of their tents.  Apparently what was in progress was the plan to move these tents to a new location, "on the River Range Road overpass, looking down on the busy Highway 6 overpass".  This was clearly an act of provocation and could have been the beginning of a new "initiative" in blockading the area. So the decision last Saturday was to take the banner (seen in a photo in my earlier posting) and establish a satellite protest site at one of the roads (7th Line / River Range Road apparently) crossing the Caledonia bypass.  There were people braiding white corn - all very festive.  Apparently the road was not blocked, but as history tells us, in a heartbeat things could change with tire fires, items tossed on the bypass from above - who  knows (although tried and true techniques from former days are pretty well everything in the toolkit).  As dark set in on Saturday, "the bridge site was voluntarily removed and the protesters returned to Kanonstaton (DCE)".  Unfortunately for the "protesters" there is simply not the same support on the Reserve that there was in 2006 - the thugs they can always depend on, but not the majority of the Rez.

Understandably the OPP were concerned that this was a set up for another Highway 6 blockade, so the, "OPP converged on the Highway 6 site enmass, parking a number of cruisers in front of the gate at Kanonstaton to prevent that from taking place".  Apparently the OPP were about to arrest one of the "protesters" but backed off when surrounded.  There is still the possibility of charges being laid at a later date (the OPP know who they are dealing with).  "The next day, Sunday, police removed the concrete blocks in front of the Kanonstaton site as well as the remnants of the hydro tower used in 2006 which has been used a number of times since to prevent traffic on the highway.  Once again the protesters remained peaceful but objected loudly".  The ringleader said, "I guess they thought we were going to put the barricade back up on Highway 6".  This same person has the gall to say that the OPP over reacted since all they planned to do was, "gathering to take a picture of a sign they designed using the white corn - braids they made at the overpass earlier".  Oh yes, that is really believable!

The Turtle Island News of 27 September 2017 has an article on this subject called, "OPP remove tower from Kanonstation [sic] after night of 'cat and mouse'" part of which can be seen here.  After  purchasing a hard paper copy of the paper, the content here provides few further details.  They say that the OPP was trying to arrest the man due to outstanding warrants (BTW Six Nations Police will get him later), creating a back and forth with the tower being moved to the entrance to Surrey Street (and DCE), then back again.  Apparently early in the afternoon the OPP decided that "game of cat and mouse" had gone far enough - that this would eventually result in the tower being dragged on Argyle Street South (only a few feet away) again (highly likely), so when it was on Surrey Street outside the gates and at 2 p.m. the OPP formed a line and they removed it along with the concrete blocks which have also been "pressed into service" in order to block the road (Argyle Street South).  They told the "protesters" that the reason was to prevent, "commission of any offence and to prevent the materials from being a traffic hazard".  Great move - score one for our OPP.  There is a photo in the newspaper showing a flat bed tow truck winching the tower on to its bed.  Now that wretched reminder of "the bad old days" is gone, and the "protesters" will have to find something else to drag on to Argyle Street South.

New Barricade?:

Wooden Structure on Surrey Street Inside DCE Gates 29 September 2017

It was interesting to note the above wooden "tower like" structure placed in the same location as the old Hydro One stub of a tower before its removal last Sunday.  So, the question is, what is its purpose?  I can guess, but time will tell.

An Assessment and Message for Those at DCE:  To the "protesters" - you are beat, done, kaput.  There is no more wiggle room, especially in those tents.  There is a nip to the air, and it will soon be downright uncomfortable to sit for hours pondering your navel while the world spins all around you.  Those with any smarts will know it is time to pack up and go home.  You have no support off Reserve, and below 10% on Reserve.  The business folk along 6th Line alone will find a way to "get you gone" - always better to leave on your own terms.

The "protesters" are now dealing with an OPP who is very savy to the antics of this group of agitators and can well see what the next step is going to be.  Lets say, it seems that the OPP has learned over the years since 2006 what to expect from these disgruntled Onzlows.  Apparently some 20 to 30 "protesters" were established at the DCE site on Monday.  Guess these worthies must own their own businesses or something - to be able to take so much time off work to "protest".

One thing is a constant at Six Nations, due to false narratives and outright lies, there are always going to be "buyers" for nonsense, and things will NEVER reach a "settled state" for anyone who lives anywhere near the Reserve.  Why, because once again the real problem boils down to FALSE BELIEFS, totally unsupported by anything (a document, or, well, anything what so ever), that the land along the Grand River is still Six Nations property because it was taken from them by the nasty Colonial Government sometime after the Haldimand Proclamation of 1784.  The TRUTH is that all of the Chiefs in Council, in other words all of the Hereditary Chiefs (as per "The Great Law"), signed documents from the 1780s to 1847 which they saw as being in the best interests of the people of Six Nations.  Their decisions resulted in the consolidation of the scattered properties into one large Reserve, IR 40 in Tuscarora and parts of Onondaga and Oneida Townships, and stemmed the flow of Six Nations people to the west and allowed them to live together "as a people".  Had the wise Chiefs not done this I can guarantee that the Six Nations would have merged into the general community and would just be a page in history and a line or two in family trees.

In a subsequent posting I will show how the land was sold off piecemeal by individual Six Nations residents to "settlers" as the only way to bring in enough money to sustain their families (since only the Mohawk had large farming operations capable of supporting their families and having enough money to live in comfort).  In other words I will provide objective truth based on contemporary facts and evidence - in contrast to personal truth based on wishful thinking and long standing beliefs so entrenched that they are accepted without question.

There are those who know in their heart of hearts that something is desperately wrong.  Tents, ticks and tempests.  Being let down by the people you thought were fully on board.  Disappointments at every turn.

Year after year passes and the same angry unsubstantiated claims are made about colonialism, cultural genocide and scores of other bogus concepts which draw people into the victim mentality and learned helplessness and an inevitable downward spiral when they buy into the blame game.  This stuff strangles the life out of you.

There is no such thing as personal responsibility at DCE, and often beyond, only finger pointing at others who are the perceived cause of intractable problems.  A hopeless situation really for which there is no solution - except escape from the constraints and negativity by moving away - better than being sucked down the toilet of life and ending up a bitter broken individual grasping at intangibles and contributing nothing.  I can guarantee that you will just be dragged deeper and deeper into the quick sand.  Not a pretty prospect.

What if a mega far reaching law suit is in the works?  One which will require testifying in Court, and the possibility of immense fines (recall 2009, Brantford Superior Court).  Those millions that have been extracted by the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC) and their enforcers at the Haudenosaunee Development Institute (HDI) will not likely be enough to pay legal fees let alone a small fraction of the terms of settlement.  Those that can see the writing on the wall, will act accordingly.

Time to decide what side of the fence (such as the one surrounding DCE) you stand upon - no not the canoe or the ship legend so full of holes that both sink - but falling backwards into darkness at DCE versus standing strong and moving toward the light.

This assessment may resonate with some at DCE, others not so much, and many not at all.  Truly trying times though.

DY.

Important Court Ruling: Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council Suffers Major Defeat

I have repeatedly said that the ONLY way that the thorny issues of claims of treaty rights, supposedly unsurrendered land, and who has the right to govern at Six Nations Reserve can only be settled by the Provincial Superior Court system in either Brantford or Cayuga - or if the Federal Government gets involved.

A very important, and likely precedent setting, decision has been made by Justice Harper of the Superior Court in Brantford - one that basically eviscerates the assertions of the Haudenosaunee Hereditary Chiefs Council (HCCC) as being the legitimate governing body at Six Nations, and basically neutering them by recognizing the Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC) as the representatives of the Six Nations people tasked with speaking for Six Nations in any matter involving the Provincial or Federal Governments.

The whole despicable saga of the theft of the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE) property by Six Nations militants in 2006 under the guise of claiming (falsely) that the land was unsurrendered, the barricades set up across Argyle Street South, the Provincial Government purchase of the DCE property from the legal owners and "gifting" to Six Nations, and the negotiations to extort money or land from the Government (Provincial or Federal - it ended up being Provincial) in order to have the barricades removed has been detailed at length multiple times in this blog - and there is a wealth of info online.  While SNEC is the legal representative of Six Nations, the instigator of the "land reclamation" (theft) was orchestrated by HCCC, the previous governing body at Six Nations (until 1924) and members of same who were to become the Haudenosaunee Development Institute (HDI - the "muscle").  To keep peace in the family, SNEC offered HCCC a seat at the negotiating table (although the latter were NOT happy about this arrangement).  That was 2006, but what about 2017?

Recent events, including the schlepping of the Hydro One tower (what was left of it) over Argyle Street South in Caledonia on 10 August 2017, came about via a dispute over who should have the say as to what happens with the Burtch lands in Brant County.  The "main event" involved a woman (Kristine Hill) and her ex - husband (Ed Green), supporters of the HCCC and its "enforcement branch", the Haudenosaunee Development Institute (HDI).  She had tilled the land, and planted crops on the Burtch property.  They claimed to have a lease from the HCCC, and ignored an order from SNEC to vacate these lands.

To make a long story short (since this is not the point of the present posting), Ms. Hill lost and was found to have "willfully disobeyed" a Court Order to vacate.  Details of this case can be found in The Sachem, 22 September 2017, in an article entitled, "Judge rules in favour of Six Nations Elected Council over Burtch property" - click here.

What is important in the wider sense is that in a court of law the claim that the HCCC was unable to muster even rudimentary evidence that there was merit to this case, which hinged on their authority to determine the rights of Ms. Hill to farm the land at Burtch.

What is of critical importance:

1)  The ruling of Justice Harper that, he could not recognize the HCCC’s right to decide the future of the Burtch lands based on Hill’s statement that she was raised to pledge allegiance to the Haudonosaunee chiefs. Harper said he was unable to Hill’s argument because there was virtually no evidence presented to him by her lawyers supporting the claim.

2)  The Court Order was issued, in response to a claim by Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC) that they hold the title to all 380 acres of the Burtch lands through a corporation (9646035 Canada Limited) created to keep the lands in trust for the people of Six Nations.

3)  In 2006, Six Nations extorted what became known as the "Peterson Promise" from the Ontario Government.  In essence, "we will remove the barricade across Argyle Street South in Haldimand County if you given us the Burtch Correctional property in Brant County such that we can add these lands to the Reserve".  More specifically, The “Peterson Promise” stated that the land would be returned to the status it once held under the Haldimand Proclamation of 1784, which allowed the Six Nations people to settle and live on six miles of land along the entire length of the Grand River, on both sides. The HCCC backed out of the negotiations before the agreement was reached.  

So even though both SNEC and HCCC were at the negotiation (extortion) table, HCCC walked out before any deal was reached yet has the gall to insist that they are the only group who have the rights to decide the fate of the Burtch lands!

In desperation, the Burch occupier brought out the old boogey man of "Treaty rights".  There is NO TREATY with Six Nations but that has never stopped individuals from using this tattered old worn out assertion to try to get leverage.  It did not work.   So Hill asserted, her Aboriginal treaty rights to farm the Burtch lands, Harper cited a case involving Tyendinaga and CN Rail that showed treaty rights cannot be asserted by an individual.  Furthermore, to repeat, there is no treaty of any description that applies to the Six Nations of the Grand River.  It is the hope of the present author that soon this matter will be taken to Court and Six Nations will be required to produce the phantom treaty.  They won't do this of course because they would lose, and this would have tremendous implications for the extortion of millions of dollars from green energy companies and land developers in Southwestern Ontario based on making them believe that a treaty actually exists, and Six Nations need to have a cut of the action.

In other words, the proceedings have much broader implications for Six Nations and the people of Haldimand and Brant Counties.  SNEC is the only group at Six Nations who can establish a legitimate claim to be the representatives of the occupants of the Six Nations Reserve - even if there is a large faction who disagrees.  Lets hope that the can or worms, or Pandora's Box has been opened and we can obtain a Court ruling on all bogus Six Nations claims (treaties, unsurrendered land).  We have been waiting a long, long time.  What if the Federal Government said, "Ok, enough is enough, lets go to Court and let the evidence speak".  Not going to happen, but I can dream.

DY.

Conversation With OPP Officers "Standing" Vigil at the DCE Barricade Site (Opposite Surrey Street)

Recently I had the opportunity to speak with OPP officers who are working 12 hour shifts, with two cars present, 24 hours of the day, 7 days a week, parked directly opposite the gate to the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE or Kanonstaton) property.

Clearly there is only so much that the officers were able to provide in the way of information.  To do otherwise would be to jeopardize the operational plan.

First I should note that the right hand gate door was open fully, thus seeming to indicate that in fact there was no padlock placed there by the OPP (calling into question information given to me by a resident living proximal to the site).

The officers stationed opposite the DCE site are from scattered detachments throughout the Province, since in the past the Six Nations activists have made a point of taking down the licence plate numbers of the personal vehicles of the police officers at Cayuga and informing them that, "we know where you live".  In relation to the "protesters" who did that, I have always thought, "how low can you go".

In response to my inquiry about contingency plans IF the "protesters" at DCE decided to drag what remains of the Hydro One "tower" across the road again, since they don't seem to have a Plan B to deploy, the answer was YES.  I realized that any further information would compromise their actions, so did not press for more information.

I did inform an officer that it was my understanding "from unnamed sources" that the "protesters" were planning to stay all winter in those tents, so the OPP will need to plan accordingly.

All in all we had a pleasant conversation and I did note to the officers that it was my sincere hope that the OPP has changed since 2006 - to which an officer stated that indeed things have changed, from leadership on down.

I was left feeling confident that if not exactly what we would expect, we will never go back to the bad old days when the OPP were literally taking sides, and it was NOT ours.

DY

MPP Toby Barrett is Pressuring the Government to Provide Compensation to Businesses and Others Who Suffered with the Latest Blockade

This just in from the Hon. Toby Barrett, MPP, Haldimand - Norfolk.  Please read my comments at the end:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Sept. 15, 2017

Barrett reiterates demand for Caledonia compensation

QUEEN’S PARK – Haldimand-Norfolk MPP Toby Barrett has reiterated his call for compensation to businesses and homeowners in the wake of the Argyle Street blockade.

During Question Period this week, Barrett explained to the Ontario Legislature that the month-long blockade put “businesses and homeowners through psychological and economic hell.”

“Many customers faced a six-mile detour, businesses lost 25 to 60 per cent, staff were let go or had hours cut,” he said. “Homeowners expressed concern about property values, and compromised service from firefighters, police and ambulance.”

In a previous media report, Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation David Zimmer was quoted: “The province’s role in the standoff is one, essentially, of standing back and letting the Six Nations community resolve this issue.”

Barrett concluded his first question by asking, “What steps have you taken to arrange compensation – as has been done in the past – for Caledonia and area homeowners and businesses.” He directed his questions to the acting premier on Wednesday because Premier Kathleen Wynne was absent to testify in the Sudbury by-election trial.

Not satisfied with the answer from the Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation that basically just recounted what had occurred, Barrett continued his line of questioning back to the acting premier.

“On Sept. 2, a local newspaper reported that when a fire was set on the Southern Ontario Railway in Caledonia, a Caledonia fire truck was not allowed to pass through the barricade, not allowed to put it out,” Barrett said.

“On Sept. 4, Labour Day, police attempted to secure Haldimand County Sixth Line at the bridge. Again, to quote another local paper, they ‘were sent away by protesters and ordered to take up a position further back, which they did.’

“We’ve seen this film before – no firefighters, no police, and no customers in the stores,” Barrett continued. “Caledonia now worries, when will this happen again? Acting premier, have you and the federal government . . . my question is are you working with the federal government – as in the past – to compensate residents of Caledonia?”

Again, the government dodged the question and did not address the issue of compensation, saying what occurred 10 years ago  was different since there was peaceful resolution this time. Barrett attempted to interject that it’s now been 11-1/2 years.

“The point here is that 10 years ago there was a situation in Caledonia that went on and on and on, and there were real issues of public safety,” Zimmer argued. “This time, there was a blockade that went up and issues developed. But the point, again, is that all persons involved in the resolution of that blockade, be they police, fire responders, first responders, the ministry of indigenous affairs or the Ontario Provincial Police—it was resolved peacefully. That’s progress. That’s in the spirit of reconciliation.”

Barrett has indicated he will continue to push for compensation for Caledonia businesses and homeowners.

-30-

For more information, contact MPP Toby Barrett at 519-428-0446 or toby.barrett@pc.ola.org

YOUTUBE link

https://youtu.be/K9agcpty3WU

ONTARIO LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

OFFICIAL HANSARD

Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2017

Indigenous land dispute

Mr. Toby Barrett: To the Acting Premier: From August 10 to September 4, Labour Day, the main thoroughfare of Caledonia was blockaded, putting businesses and homeowners through psychological and economic hell. More specifically, many customers faced a six-mile detour, businesses lost 25% to 60%, and staff were let go or had their hours cut. Homeowners expressed concern about property values and compromised service from firefighters, police and ambulance. However, on September 1, your government announced it was standing down from dealing with the Caledonia blockade.

Acting Premier, what steps have you taken to arrange compensation, as has been done in the past, for Caledonia and area homeowners and area businesses?

Hon. Deborah Matthews: To the Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation.

Hon. David Zimmer: The member opposite is quite correct: There was a blockade that was put up a couple of weeks ago. Our ministry, the Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation, took that situation very seriously, as did the Six Nations elected council and the Haudenosaunee Traditional Confederacy.

I can assure the members opposite and everyone in this House that after a series of negotiations with First Nations, with the Ontario Provincial Police and with the various ministries that blockade was peacefully ended. I want to congratulate and recognize the hard work of the Ontario Provincial Police in working in a way that was respectful of the Six Nations, the Haudenosaunee and the government of Ontario.

The Speaker (Hon. Dave Levac): I’m going to allow the supplementary.

Mr. Toby Barrett: This past month was a nightmare yet again for people in the Caledonia area, and I’ve dealt with many ministries.

On September 2 a local newspaper reported that when a fire was set on the Southern Ontario Railway in Caledonia, a Caledonia fire truck was not allowed to pass through the barricade, not allowed to put it out.

On September 4, Labour Day, police attempted to secure Haldimand county Sixth Line at the bridge. Again, to quote another local paper, they “were sent away by protesters and ordered to take up a position further back, which they did.”

We’ve seen this film before—no firefighters, no police, no customers in the stores. Caledonia now worries: “When will this happen again?”

Acting Premier, my question is: Are you working with the federal government, as has been done in the past, to compensate residents of Caledonia?

Hon. David Zimmer: Thank you again for that question. The point here is that 10 years ago there was a situation in Caledonia that went on and on and on, and there were real issues of public safety. This time, there was a blockade that went up and issues developed. But the point, again, is that all persons involved in the resolution of that blockade, be they police, fire responders, first responders, the ministry of indigenous affairs or the Ontario Provincial Police—it was resolved peacefully. That’s progress. That’s in the spirit of reconciliation.

We will continue to deal with issues involving matters that First Nations raise, wherever in the province. We will deal with them in a respectful way and in a peaceful way to a constructive resolution.

___________________________

I would like to comment on the Hon. David Zimmer's comment that, "it was resolved peacefully. That’s progress. That’s in the spirit of reconciliation."  REALLY!  That is what it is?  Actually it is Six Nations calling the shots and everyone else standing by.  It is by sheer luck that tragedy did not occur since paramedics would have been blocked from getting to West Haldimand Hospital in Hagersville.  All is fine isn't it Mr. Zimmer, when one sees things from a Toronto perspective.  How about living in the south side of Caledonia during one of these blockades and see how you feel then.  Reconciliation, hardly!.  The OPP caught the thugs off guard and exercised an excellent maneuver to disperse the scattered "protesters" - otherwise we would still be blocked in.  By in large people in Toronto don't have the vaguest sense of what it is like to live next to a criminal compound with no secure walls or gates.

Thank you to Mr. Barrett.  We are blessed to have him as our representative.  Next election with a Conservative Government, we will have far more sympathetic ears in Toronto.

DY

Photos of "Protest Headquarters" on Argyle Street South in Caledonia: DCE After the Blockade

Since I just arrived home, and being well and truly jet lagged, I did my best with the bad lighting conditions at that time of day to at least get some preliminary photos of "the DCE entrance way".  So with apologies for the less than ideal quality of the visuals, I will post the first pictures I took of the Douglas Creek Estates (Kanonstathon) entrance, the hub or "operations center" of the recent "protest", as it is established today.  The barricade (location from 10 August to 4 September) was directly behind me - the photos being taken from Argyle Street South today.

Photo 1

Photo 1:  This vantage point shows Surrey Street looking west, including the right side of the gate.  Of course looking ominously at us is the stub of the Hydro One tower which had been pulled across Argyle Street South (poised to spring into action once again).  Notice the Mohawk Warriors flag on the right side of the tower, and what may be a Confederacy (Six Nations, not Dixie "stars and bars") flag on the left (too limp to make a diagnosis) - staring defiantly at those who would dare approach.  It is also noteworthy that there is a set of gang lights attached to a portable generator (can be towed).  This will give off a considerable amount of light for "work" in the dark.  The old wooden shack, the only structure remaining from the "old days", can be seen peeking over the top of a group of awnings - tents.  I cannot confirm that there is a "padlock" placed there by the OPP.  There is a chain ................... clearly further investigation is required.

Photo 2

Photo 2:  Here we see the left side of the gate, and a better view of the awnings and tents scattered around the property.  Picnic tables and garden chairs provide a festive look.  Many of the items appear to be high quality (expensive) - I wonder who paid for the gear.  I also wonder how they deal with the ticks.

Photo 3

Photo 3:  The banner seen at the blockade on the Caledonia bypass is now draped over the fence to the left of the gate.  It says, "Honour Our Treaties, Ya Big Meanies!"  Someone seems to have a semblance of a sense of humour.

Photo 4

Photo 4: It is hard to put into words the aesthetically pleasing vista of the southern entrance way to Caledonia.  Just beyond the culturally significant smoke shop, one finds the enchanted scenes that characterize the DCE property.  Above is a scene somewhat reminiscent of the Cinque Terre in Italy, with a view reflecting the Old World charm that visitors to the DCE can expect - much to the envy of our neighbours in Hagersville and Cayuga.

The shack can be seen in the far left of this picture, along with an array of tents behind it.  On the north side of Surrey Street (right side of photo) we can see that some sanitary needs of the occupiers is supplied by two "Johnny on the Spots" or similar outdoor toileting facilities.  It is a bit creepy not to see any wash up area - although it may simply be hidden.  There are no town services to the site (the occupants destroyed all the houses on site and are left with "the shack"), so everything must be brought in.  Also behind (to the west) of these blue porta potties is another cluster of tents.

Across the road from the complex (on the east side of Argyle Street South) were two Ontario Provincial Police cars pointed at the front gate.  I waved, and they waved back.  I waved and sent my greetings to two middle aged males who came to the gate at DCE.  They seem to have recognized me, all I heard was a groan (sort of "oh no, not him again" type of groan), and they walked away.

More to follow.

DY

The Organizers of the Summer 2017 Caledonia Blockade - Professional Protesters and Those Awarded Large Settlements

Throughout the whole ordeal of the August 10th to September 5th 2017 blockade of Argyle Street South in Caledona, I thought about the organizers who were there most every day, and kept asking myself, "How are these people able to show up every day to a protest?  Don't they have jobs that require their presence?  Of course some of the older ones may have been retired or independently wealthy, and some may have been funded by the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC).

Professional Protesters:  It is a well known fact, as I have blogged about time and time again since 2013, that the HCCC has bilked millions of dollars from the green energy corporations such as Samsung by convincing them that they had treaty rights (there is no treaty that covers Six Nations, as I have spoken about time and time again with postings of the original documents), and that there is unsurrendered land in the Haldimand Tract (again, I have shown that this is a false assumption by using the documentation signed by the Chiefs in Council), and that they are the legitimate government of the Six Nations people (this false assertion was at the root of the recent protest).  No one outside this group at Six Nations appears to know where the money went.  The HCCC have never opened their books to the Community (which has been but another thorny issue here abouts).  They could have used some of the millions of dollars to pay the protesters to keep vigil at the barricades.

The Settlement:  However, one of my relatives reminded me that a protest organizer is likely still living off the avails of a "settlement" with a hospital in Hamilton - one that was very controversial.  As is often the case, instead of dragging the matter through Court, the hospital provided an undisclosed sum in a "settlement".  Virtually all of us working in the system believed this person had bilked "the system", and in the process ruined the careers of a number of health care professionals.  I guess this person to this day has been able to live with themselves, and not worry too much about the considerable collateral damage.

Who is this person?  I am not going to open myself to litigation by an individual who would drag anyone through the Courts until they cried "uncle".  What I will do is cite "redacted" facts, those that I recall, those that likely can be verified by an inquisitive reporter who has the backing of media conglomerates.

My point in all this is to expose the background of the parties orchestrating the unconscionable acts which have had such a negative impact on Caledonia.

Here is what I recall, assisted by the recall of my relative.  While working as a health care provider in what is today the Hamilton Health Sciences system, a group of 7 hospitals and partner facilities "offering specialty care to people throughout the entire life cycle" (click here), I became familiar with one of the protest organizers.

Although the matter was covered extensively in The Hamilton Spectator and on CHCH TV news, since this occurred in the early 1990s, in the days before the Internet as we know it today, google searches are going to be unproductive.  The data resides in the archival files of the Spectator on microfilm, and in the minds of many of us who were working in the health system in Hamilton at the time.

To keep the information in this posting on point, I will simply list the most important details in the sequence they occurred:

1)  The person brought their aged mother to a hospital in Hamilton with symptoms of cardiac failure.

2)  During the mother's stay, the family (led by the 2017 "protester") claimed that the hospital was "racist" since the hospital was unable to provide a "translator" for the mother who allegedly only spoke Onondaga.  Of course Onondaga is a dead / dying language at Six Nations and so the demand was unreasonable.  Also to the best of my knowledge the mother spoke English; and it occurred to me at the time that if there was a concern, why did the person or other members of the family not assist here.

3)  The mother, died of cardiac failure; but the family believed that the death was caused by a Tylenol allergy.

4)  The family initiated a law suit, where, during the inquest experts testified that there had been no documented cases of "Tylenol allergy".  Also the family claimed that their mother did not speak English and did not understand that the nurse was telling her she was being given Tylenol - which if true would be highly important.  However my relative was one of the nurses who gave the patient Tylenol (there was a doctor's order), and claims that the patient understood what she was given, and responded in the affirmative when asked if it helped any with her pain.

5)  Then, as now, it is often best for those institutions or corporations accused of anything, especially when the "race card" is in play, to simply "settle" and avoid further litigation.

6)  The family received a massive "out of Court" settlement.

7)  Blame (since there needs to be a scapegoat) was ascribed to the nurse who happened to be on shift at the time the mother died.

8)  There was massive fallout within the system including resignations of excellent health care professionals who were dragged through this "no win" situation.

Hence, it is likely that the protest organizer is still living comfortably on the funds obtained from the hospital, and would have ample time to orchestrate protests.

The above is based on memory (of two persons) and if there are errors, I apologize in advance, and will be pleased to make any necessary corrections.  I have not, nor will I, name the person or family discussed here.

DY

The Aftermath of the Caledonia Blockade Summer 2017 - What Have We Learned This Time?

Now that a sense of normalcy (or an approximation since we live in Caledonia) has returned to the area, we can begin to ask some questions and formulate some potential solutions - based on the belief that most of us don't want to see a repeat of what I have described in the last half dozen postings to this blog.

First, if possible, if there is any way to bring some levity in to lighten the mood, that can only be a good thing.  The cartoon with the Editorial in The Hamilton Spectator of 7 September 2017 will strike the right cord:

Credit:  Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator

Please read the whole editorial, entitled, "The Spectator’s View: Tolerance for illegal protests must have limits" here.  The above cartoon hits the nail right on the head!

The cartoonist, Graeme MacKay, has a whole series of cartoons focusing on Caledonia - they are exceptional, and hilarious.  To see the collection click here.

The Six Nations Helped, But:  There is really only one exception I would take concerning the well written and well thought out editorial itself, and that is the "partially correct" statement that the situation was kept in check because there was pressure from Six Nations on the "protesters".  Indeed that was true, and the main core came from the business people along Sixth Line on the Rez, who, due to the blockade, were hurting badly as their profits dwindled to unsustainable levels.  They had a significant influence on the perceptions of others on the Reserve.

The reality is that perhaps 20% of Six Nations are supporters of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC), and they are well aware that with dwindling Longhouse membership, they face the potential of extinction as a group in the very near future.  Maybe 20% are supporters of the Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC), with often only 3% of eligible voters turning up for the election of Councillors.  The rest are somewhere in the middle, somewhat apathetic, and / or sit on the fence.  There is complete disunity in relation to who should be considered the "legitimate" representatives of Six Nations - but as is so often the case, the loudest voice gets heard.

So I am not about to give Six Nations a pat on the back here, it was largely (but not entirely) self interest that ensured that this "protest" would make no headway and lose support with each passing day.  I can assure one and all that there are thousands on the other side of the Rez line (Oneida Road) who, given the right circumstances, and an issue that would galvanize broader support, would once again come together with cars, trucks, heavy equipment, ATVs and motorcycles pouring down Sixth Line to "do battle".  It would only take a different dynamic, then the telephone tree and social media would kick into gear and it will once again be "us against them" - as was the case in 2006 and largely from then until August 10th.

The good news is that many on Six Nations are jaded in relation to the methods of protest.  Also major protests are likely to be localized.  The bad news for us, it is localized to the eastern end of the Reserve - yes proximal to Highway 6 (from Hagersville to Caledonia).  While some "intense" activity might occur on the north side of Caledonia, logistically there will not be the likelihood of thousands participating when you have to go cross the bridge and thread your way through well established neighbourhoods to reach the site.  The OPP could "head this off at the pass" and so it would fizzle out fairly soon since key resources would not be available.  So forget about heavy equipment etc.  The south side of Caledonia will always be the theater of choice for any mass protest - it has all the right ingredients - and it all boils down to geography.  Lucky us!

Caledonia is chronically caught in the middle of matters that have nothing what so ever to do with them.  We are innocent pawns, and have to depend on the actions of our Haldimand Mayor and Councillors, and the OPP - but generally this means just allowing the situation to play out.  We are ignored by the Federal and Provincial Governments (with few exceptions, such as our local MPP).

Correct Assertion re OPP:  The main point of the editorial, that illegal protests should not be met with an OPP response of "standing down", is spot on.  Ever since the "Dudley George affair" at Ipperwash, the OPP have done everything in their power to keep out of any altercations or illegal actions which involve "Natives".  The situation got so bad in 2006 that they would not even send out officers to rescue one of their own stranded in the no - go zone.  Yes, we still have a two - tiered policing system.  Some actions will get a local from Caledonia arrested on the spot, an example carrying a Canadian flag near the Douglas Creek Estates - which is seen as a provocative act.  However those designated as "Native" can prance around the same area with a Mohawk Warriors flag and essentially be ignored by the OPP (at least in the past).  So when Caledonians see Six Nations Confederacy (purple and white) and Mohawk Warrior (red and yellow) flags flying day and night at DCE, most of us just see "red" and think "double standard", hypocrisy - this based on our experience from 2006 to about 2014 (when things became more quiet at DCE) - prior to the renewal of conflict in August of this year.

The threat of arrest is very effective in deterring criminal protest acts - as long as there is not the possibility of huge "reinforcements" streaming in from the Rez as happened in 2006.  That need NEVER happen again with the proper preparations (e.g., being proactive in blocking key access roads).

It is important to note, however, that if the criminal act is something significant such as assault or damage over say $5,000, and enough proof can be obtained (e.g., videos), the Six Nations perpetrator will be arrested later either by the OPP, or on their behalf by the Six Nations Police.  The "Native" will then be charged, held in custody, a Court date set, and if the evidence is compelling, the person will be found guilty and fined, jailed, or more likely given a warning.

Based on the highly efficient and tactically sound approach used to dismantle the Highway 6 Bypass blockade on 5 September; and the rapid response to the attempt to blockade both the railway and the bypass, maybe we are in the process of seeing a "new and improved" OPP, one which will do us proud, I need to see a little more evidence of this.

Suggestions:  I will make a direct request to the OPP, the next time (there will be a next time unfortunately) please step in immediately to clear the road (Argyle Street South) and arrest those who are in the process of committing illegal acts on the spot.  This would indicate that the OPP I once respected was returned to the Province.  Perhaps moving past the unfortunate Ipperwash situation and simply applying the same law in the same way to each and every person would go a long way to meeting that end.

If circumstances would be more favourable by a slight delay, that certainly makes sense.  If for example, it means blocking 5th, 6th, and 7th Line with the help of the Six Nations Police, as well as the junction of Argyle Street South and the Caledonia Bypass - that would probably be a more productive approach - and we can change "immediately" to "as soon as all the ducks are lined up in a row".  If there is a choice, operations after dark, and in the rain, will have a greater chance of success.  The use of drones and a "ghetto bird" (helicopter with a night sun) or even better two, will also help ensure what situation might await - especially when used with bull horns.  The chopper also has a psychological effect, and sends the message that arrest is immanent - and will likely send all but the most stubborn scurrying.  If a bearcat and well supported SWAT team can be arranged, so much the better.

The point is that negotiation does not work with these "land protectors" (thugs), history has taught us this over and over.

The Protesters Presently at DCE:  The disgruntled "protesters" have returned to their "headquarters", so now again assemble on the other side of the gate at DCE to "lick their wounds", and plan their next move - like snakes coiled and ready to strike.  The "weapon of choice", when action is taken, will of course be the remnants of the Hydro One tower which stands at the ready, by the gate, poised to spring into action (or more correctly be hauled 50 feet to the middle of Argyle Street South).

Considering that among the road "debris" deposited by the "protesters", and removed by the Ministry of Transport contractor, were tires, many will find the following cartoon again hits its mark:

Graeme MacKay

I lived through the Hagersville Tire Fire of 1990 where 14 million tires burned for weeks and we were under constant threat of evacuation.  The fire was ignited by a group of young worthies from Six Nations (see here) - who did jail time for their misdeeds.  Back in those days it did not matter if you were from Six Nations or Hagersville, if you did the crime, you did the time - no double standard.  The "tire fire technique" was pressed into service by these great "land protectors" again during the 2006 mega conflict, and on numerous other occasions which have received less attention - and apparently tire fires were part of the plan for the Highway 6 Caledonia bypass.

Indeed, as per the question posed in the heading to this posting, we have learned that the Six Nations "protesters" are characterized by considerable "continuity" in their behavioural repertoire (they have little imagination, are highly predictable, and possess little of substance in their toolkit).

Will the Conflict Play Out at the Demolition Derby at the Caledonia Fair?:  For those who are aficionados of the arts and fine wine, you might want to attend our annual "demolition derby" at the Caledonia Fair (28 September to 1 October 2017) - click here.  At both the small car and full size car events (not so much with the kiddie cars), the Caledonia and the Ohsweken (Six Nations) teams have the opportunity to go at it and bash their opponent's vehicles to a smoking mass of crushed steel.  Sometimes the animosity between communities appears to take on a very personal aspect - perhaps this year even more so.  We shall see.

This just in:  I have it on good authority that the OPP has placed a padlock on the gates at DCE.  This, if correct, could be a significant development.  I will investigate, and provide photos, as soon as I return home.

DY

OPP Dismantles Barricade at Caledonia Bypass

Well, will wonders never cease.  In a nutshell, late last night the OPP moved in with about 50 officers and a "tactical unit" (70 officers in all) at about 11 p.m. and took away most of the debris blocking the Caledonia bypass, citing as the reason, "public safety".  The protesters dispersed and no one was arrested.  The action was taken with the assistance of the Six Nations Police.

Pictures taken on scene by a freelance photographer, as well as details of how the operation unfolded, can be found in the CBC article, "Police dismantling blockade on Highway 6 in Caledonia", 5 September 2017 - click here.

Photo:  David Richie

"In an updated press release, Ontario Provincial Police said both roads have been reopened to through traffic as of 2:20 p.m. Tuesday". 

See here for a local perspective, and the view of Councillor Grice of Caledonia in "OPP dismantle Caledonia blockade", The Sachem, 5 September 2017.

An excellent video of the events can be found at CTV Kitchener, click here.  One item of note is the OPP officer indicating that while to date no arrests have been made, there is an ongoing investigation into any criminal activity that has taken place.

Assessment of Role of OPP:  The one word that comes to mind is, "finally".  I will congratulate the OPP on a job well done.  The "protesters" did not seem to understand that they crossed the line when they blocked the railway, and then Highway 6 - neither of those acts can be tolerated.  Furthermore the OPP correctly "made their move" after dark.  This tactical decision, along with blocking Sixth Line all the way to the Rez ensured that reinforcements could / would not come pouring in as happened in 2006.  The telephone tree and social media would not be able to muster much help under these circumstances.  Of course this time things were very different in that most Six Nations wanted the barricade gone, and to say the least there was tepid enthusiasm for helping to keep it afloat.  Kudos to all.

Impact of These Events on the HCCC:  This did not end well for the HCCC and supporters (the "protesters").  As a matter of fact they may have "lost face" (the image they wish to convey in the eyes of Six Nations and Government authorities).  It ended with the "protesters" or "land protectors" scurrying away in defeat.

If history teaches us anything, it is that there is no ability of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council (HCCC) and their sympathizers to come up with creative, novel solutions.  They appear unable to see or understand the wider effects of their actions.  Also it is abundantly clear that there is nary a whisker of empathy for the residents of Caledonia - there never has been any.  How will this then play out in the long run?  Probably at some point soon they will swing into action again, likely using the same old tactics that have "worked" before - blockading Argyle Street South.  Like rats in a Skinner box (Psychology 101), they have been rewarded for acting at this one "magical" spot - so this rewarded behaviour is likely to occur again.

My dream is that the HCCC has now lost most of its credibility on Six Nations, and will have no choice but to become a ceremonial group dedicated to reminding the people of their proud past, and will work closely and cooperatively with the Six Nations Elected Council (SNEC) in putting forward their agenda.  However I know full well that the HCCC is rife with factionalism, and will never give in to reality and acknowledge the legal role of SNEC.  Many HCCC chiefships are currently vacant, or occupied by a "chief" not only of the wrong Nation, but the wrong clan.  Meetings are frequently cancelled due to a lack of a quorum, or meetings end abruptly when the Head Chief walks out in a huff.  How could they possibly take over the efficient day to day operation of a community of 23,000.  It is a shame really, because both groups working together would offer strength and continuity.  It is not possible to return to 1924 (let alone 1492), and until HCCC realizes this they will continue to engage in ultimately self destructive actions which only tear the community further apart.

Severe Lack of Understanding of  19th Century History:  Much of what we have seen can be distilled to immense ignorance - on the part of many to most - even the Provincial Government.  I can say this on the basis of having searched all of the Six Nations "Indian Affairs Papers" in the Library and Archives Canada in Ottawa, and the relevant documents housed in the Archives of Ontario in Toronto, as well as all the documents at the Woodland Indian Cultural Educational Center (old Mohawk Institute), over the past many years in my quest to learn more about my own family.  I believe that only myself and P.M., the SNEC Land Researcher, can make a claim to having completed such an extensive search of all relevant documents.

What is vitally important to note is that as shown in the original documents which I have posted to this blog, the original 2006 "reclamation" of the Douglas Creek Estates (DCE) property in Caledonia by Six Nations has no justification except in belief and wishful thinking, and was therefore an act of theft.  This parcel and surrounding land was surrendered by 47 Chiefs in Council in 1844.  Thus that occupation of the property was unconscionable, as was the original blockade, let alone the explosion of violence and vandalism that followed.  Therefore the lands at DCE were obtained by fraud, and the barricade was there as a result of a criminal act.  Thus there was no need for the Ontario Government to agree to hand over the Burtch lands in Brant County to any group within Six Nations in order to remove the blockade - this was blatant extortion.  So it follows that there was no valid rationale for establishing the 2017 blockade of Argyle Street South; and so the OPP had the responsibility to remove it immediately.  The events of 10 August to 5 September 2017 should never have happened, let alone the antecedent actions.

Effect on Caledonia 2017:  Boiling it all down, we  suffered in Caledonia because of "internal strife" (factionalism) at Six Nations, as well as wider ignorance of the facts.  We were the victims (again) of the incorrect rationale of the HCCC who are always quick to point the finger of blame at the Federal or Ontario Governments, both of whom are factually blameless in this whole debacle.  However we in Caledonia are more "accessible" than either of the Governments in Ottawa or Toronto, so we are the ones who get sucker punched.

The financial losses suffered by Caledonia (and Six Nations) businesses is significant, and is a matter of which we will learn more shortly.  Residents of Caledonia can confirm that it is a shame that after all we have been through since 2006, the blockade of Argyle Street South was allowed to remain for almost a month - and who knows for how much longer if Six Nations people were not pressuring them to move.  Again kicked in the teeth.  If others ever want to know what it feels like to be a sacrificial lamb offered up to political correctness run amuck, Government inaction, and police hesitancy to act against Indians, come live on the south side of Caledonia.  Our only allies were (are) the Mayor of Haldimand and Council.

Every day those at the southern end of town are forced to look upon the derelict, tick infested, moonscape that is the present Douglas Creek Estates site, which was once again the hub of the militant acts.  The illegal "occupiers" have destroyed everything on site but left trash and debris within the fence they chose to construct.  It is a horrid reminder of all that has happened.  For some, particularly those residing nearest to DCE, this is in the category of "post traumatic stress".  The stress factor cannot be quantified.

In Sum:  So, knowing what has happened, and that the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour, I ask the question, "what is next", and "when will it happen"?  This time it was all about who at Six Nations has control of a field of soy beans in Brant County, tomorrow and the day after .................

I will end this posting on a somewhat upbeat note, garnished with the cruel reality we must endure.  The most recent article in The Sachem, 6 September 2017, is entitled, "Caledonia roads open, but police remain on scene at DCE" - click here.  One quote is from the optimistic side of things:  "It was a refreshing sight for Caledonia residents on Wednesday morning as all roads in and around Caledonia are open for the first time in over a month".  On a more sobering note: "a police presence of two cars remains outside the fenced gate of the Douglas Creek Estates property".

So while all is well for the moment, the OPP are well aware that at any minute the "protesters" are likely to drag that pathetic purloined piece of Hydro One property across the road and once again trigger the whole blockade process.

This is all part of the "background" to life and living hereabouts.  We live in Caledonia, an idyllic town situated along the historic and beautiful Grand River, but the prototypical example in Ontario of a community distressed due to recurrent extended periods of lawlessness.  It is really very hard to live this way - with the "sword of Damocles" hanging over our heads - "when will it drop next?"

Addendum:  The most comprehensive coverage of the matter, particularly the details of the removal of the Highway 6 bypass blockade, can be found on the CHCH News in Hamilton of 5 September 2017 (but posted 6 September), entitled "Caledonia Blockade cleared" and can be found here. Note at the end of the clip, the ominous statement from the "protesters" ensconced behind the fence gates at DCE (where once again the old tower was dragged - this artifact is fast becoming a museum piece with its own story to tell).

Sometimes we wonder whether any outside Caledonia, say media people, really understand what is truly percolating under the surface.  There is a very good article, "Scott Thompson:  Caledonia gets town back, for now" in CHML (audio and blog) of 6 September 2017 - click here.  Clearly Mr. Thompson can see to the root of the problem and how Caledonia is merely a pawn in other peoples games.

I get the sense that the media in general does understand that this present situation has nothing to do with land claims, and everything to do with internal politics at Six Nations, and that Caledonia is being victimized by those who would hold the town hostage to meet their own arcane goals.  Clearly a step forward.

DY